8 Comments
User's avatar
EJ's avatar

Michael Prescott - author of the dossier into the BBC - himself doctored Trump quotes in the report, making his evidence seem more damning. The New World's political editor James Ball joins James O'Brien to discuss the 'devastating' revelation that calls into question Prescott’s journalistic judgement.

https://youtu.be/RYPRQj0NtIU

Charles Fox's avatar

If the facts don't support the Zionist agenda, just make up some that do!

It's amazing how many Jewish people are actually "antisemites" according to the BBC. Now the perpetrators of genocide are actually the victims. Anti-journalism from the BBC.

thelonegunman's avatar

i see this 'lawsuit' was announced at roughly the same time as news of mi-6's james bonds getting caught trying to hijack / steal a mig-31 armed with hypersonics ... but i'm sure that's just a coincidence

Baz's avatar

Another good piece of proper journalism by Jonathan. The trouble is, the vast majority of the BBC’s listeners/viewers have been gaslit and groomed to oblivion.

Stephen Richards's avatar

A speech given to AIPAC a couple of years ago by Sir Ephraim Mirvis demonstrates the 'true purpose' of orchestrated allegations of anti-Semitism made in MSM, is designed to be a perpetual & convenient stick to beat Socialists such as Bernie Sanders in USA & Jeremy Corbyn in Britain.

Dan Gmaj's avatar

Glad to be on board JC, great work! 👏 The BBC tanker that I have been hoping could slowly turn around, now seems to be closer than ever to a rocky end! In our world of unchecked media echo chambers, something needs to give, 8 take no pleasute from this! 😑

Frank Sterle Jr.'s avatar

Many, if not most, Western corporate news-media outlets are/were complicit in (or perhaps even enabling) Israel’s campaign of systematic mass starvation and slaughter of Gazan non-combatants young and old, almost a third of whom are children. At best, those news-media have been editorially emasculated thus negligent. Though it may be due to orders from ownership headquarters and therefore beyond their control, our (Canada's) news-media are serious offenders.

The most notable example is The National Post. One would really have to read it to believe it, especially since the initial (October 7) Hamas attack against Israel. It epitomizes an extreme example of an echo chamber promoting unconditional 110% support for the Israeli state, including its very-long-practiced cruelty towards the Palestinian people.

For example, shortly after that Hamas attack, a single-column story about a five-year-old American-Palestinian boy who was stabbed to death by the landlord of the residence in which he and his mother lived simply for being Palestinian was placed on page 5, while placed up high on the front page was a large photo (which accompanied a much larger story) with three Israeli teenage girls crying after their friends or family were kidnapped by Hamas gunmen.

More progressive outlets in Canada (e.g. The Globe and Mail national newspaper) — progressive in regard to basically following “woke” ideology: that of race, sexuality, gender and gender-bending — may be considered more deceptive with their largely pro-Israel stance, especially since 10/7, while attempting to appear objective.

SmellTheCoffee's avatar

Just so SO TRUE - thank you . The BBC and Panorama WERE seen as bastions of free speech good journalism . That

image was probably NEVER warranted .Merely look at their relentless PUSHING of “ The Weapons of mass DISTRACTION “ justifying the UKs war mongering abd attack on a non belligerent country

Irony upon Irony the war criminal Blair is being placed at the TOP of the “rebuild” of Gaza.

It could NOT be anymore disgusting.