I am promoting my campaign to be the new president and treasurer of all nonprofits, and then we are all going to stand up together and invoke the Declaration of Independence. We are taking back our consent to be governed by this corrupt government. Google me, Sassy Grace Woodruff, Nancy K Woodruff, Nancy k Sack.
Nonprofits are not owned by their creators. They are owned by the entire public as they are public corporations. When a nonprofit is breaking its bylaws, and they all are, then anyone of the public can call a vote for new leadership of any nonprofit. I am asking for all of them. I can hold two offices, president and treasurer, so that I have control of the money and can spend it as I please. If you see somebody who is hungry and you have the means to feed them and you don't do it your faith is dead. A nonprofit is only for humanitarian reasons and if they have any money in the bank and someone is hungry, they must feed them or they are breaking their bylaws.
Nonprofit means no money in the bank if someone is in need. A true nonprofit is capable of spending all the incoming money, so that it circles around and comes back. The Bible says every seven years the church must declare jubilee, which means no one owes debt anymore except for their property, and every third seven years which is 21 years they are debt-free including all property. I have never heard of a Jubilee ever taking place but that's what I plan to do when everyone chooses me to be the new president and treasurer of all those trillions and trillions of dollars.
Familiar nonprofits are Bill Gates's foundation, Warren Buffett's foundation, World Vision, Feed the Children, Red Cross, the Catholic Church, the Baptist Church, the Pentecostal church, Jehovah's Witnesses, the Mormons, Islam's nonprofits, Salvation Army, Boys and Girls Clubs, Feeding America, United Way, UNICEF, American Heart Association, Goodwill, Rockefeller foundation, and so many more!
Once we are taking care of ourselves, there is absolutely nothing the government can do when we take back our consent to be governed, because that's what the Declaration of Independence tells us to do.
When, in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands, which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the Earth, the separate and equal station, to which the laws of nature and nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind, requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created, equal that they are endowed by their Creator, with certain unalienable rights that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the CONSENT of the governed.
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter, or to abolish it, and institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall see most likely to affect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience has shown that mankind are more DISPOSED to SUFFER, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future Security.
Such has been the patient sufferance of the people of the United States, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of Government. The history of the US Presidents is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct objection the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the United States. To prove this let facts be submitted to a candid world.
The presidents have refused their assent to laws the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
TIME TO ADD YOUR GRIEVANCES TO THE LIST THAT IS WAY LONGER THAN THEY HAD AGAINST THE KING OF ENGLAND. WE SHALL FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT WHERE ALL MEN AND WOMEN AND CHILDREN, REGARDLESS OF THE COLOR OF THEIR SKIN, OR WHERE THEY CAME FROM SHALL BE EQUAL! Make life fair for all.
Very few people mention the fatwah in Iran which prevents them from developing or using nuclear b0mbs. The state of Iran is moral and ethical and as a theocracy it lives by the word of Allah swt.
Brilliant Jonathan. On the one hand I have my doubts about the ability of the US to impose it's will on the rest of the world, on the other I look at the state of the UK and clearly see the effects of 50 years of not standing up to neocons, full spectrum dominance. But even here there are the seeds of resistance. It has taken me years to derive a model with sufficient explanatory power to describe MOST of what we see. You write it down, clearly and concisely. Great work. Thanks.
I agree with everything you say Jonathan. Just one thing. I believe the wars in Ukraine & Israel are to stop BRICS from growing any stronger. At the moment these are economical wars, China, Russia, Iran. India is a bit of an oddball as its Islamophobic thanks to Pakistani terrorists (possibly MOSSAD led). But are still friendly with Russia (for helping India gain Independence and kicking out the Brits!)
July 6-7 in Brazil is the BRICS 2025 Summit. Lets see if the "West's" MSM starts frothing at the mouth demonising the countries that do not obey!
Totally agree. It's about oil and the petro-dollar. If the US loses its stranglehold on the current financial system, its markets will crash. As BRICS gets stronger, the US gets more frightened and panicky, because they do not want a multipolar world, only hegemony.
With a privilege-/entitlement-based mentality, Netanyahu's Israel bombs and destroys targets, including civilians, inside nations around it — not to mention assassinates foreign citizens who Israel deems a threat.
Not that long ago, Israel attacked the Iranian embassy in Damascus last April that killed, among others, senior Iranian generals; and then Israel brazenly warned Iran against retaliating, with U.S./Canadian/British news-media headlines referencing it as though Iran's retaliation would be the first, war-instigating strike. They behaved like, to use a Trumpian slander, “crooked media”.
This all reveals a great yet misplaced sense of entitlement by the Israeli state, not to mention that of the U.S. via its own corrupt foreign policy. It’s as though it feels it can claim it was being proactive in its militarily unprovoked killings in another country of Iranians [or other foreign nationals] it deems a threat, and its suspicions should suffice as justification. But they really don't.
I am promoting my campaign to be the new president and treasurer of all nonprofits, and then we are all going to stand up together and invoke the Declaration of Independence. We are taking back our consent to be governed by this corrupt government. Google me, Sassy Grace Woodruff, Nancy K Woodruff, Nancy k Sack.
Nonprofits are not owned by their creators. They are owned by the entire public as they are public corporations. When a nonprofit is breaking its bylaws, and they all are, then anyone of the public can call a vote for new leadership of any nonprofit. I am asking for all of them. I can hold two offices, president and treasurer, so that I have control of the money and can spend it as I please. If you see somebody who is hungry and you have the means to feed them and you don't do it your faith is dead. A nonprofit is only for humanitarian reasons and if they have any money in the bank and someone is hungry, they must feed them or they are breaking their bylaws.
Nonprofit means no money in the bank if someone is in need. A true nonprofit is capable of spending all the incoming money, so that it circles around and comes back. The Bible says every seven years the church must declare jubilee, which means no one owes debt anymore except for their property, and every third seven years which is 21 years they are debt-free including all property. I have never heard of a Jubilee ever taking place but that's what I plan to do when everyone chooses me to be the new president and treasurer of all those trillions and trillions of dollars.
Familiar nonprofits are Bill Gates's foundation, Warren Buffett's foundation, World Vision, Feed the Children, Red Cross, the Catholic Church, the Baptist Church, the Pentecostal church, Jehovah's Witnesses, the Mormons, Islam's nonprofits, Salvation Army, Boys and Girls Clubs, Feeding America, United Way, UNICEF, American Heart Association, Goodwill, Rockefeller foundation, and so many more!
Once we are taking care of ourselves, there is absolutely nothing the government can do when we take back our consent to be governed, because that's what the Declaration of Independence tells us to do.
When, in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands, which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the Earth, the separate and equal station, to which the laws of nature and nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind, requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created, equal that they are endowed by their Creator, with certain unalienable rights that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the CONSENT of the governed.
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter, or to abolish it, and institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall see most likely to affect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience has shown that mankind are more DISPOSED to SUFFER, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future Security.
Such has been the patient sufferance of the people of the United States, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of Government. The history of the US Presidents is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct objection the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the United States. To prove this let facts be submitted to a candid world.
The presidents have refused their assent to laws the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
TIME TO ADD YOUR GRIEVANCES TO THE LIST THAT IS WAY LONGER THAN THEY HAD AGAINST THE KING OF ENGLAND. WE SHALL FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT WHERE ALL MEN AND WOMEN AND CHILDREN, REGARDLESS OF THE COLOR OF THEIR SKIN, OR WHERE THEY CAME FROM SHALL BE EQUAL! Make life fair for all.
Right let’s infuriate scumbag israel forever after.
Israhell knew that hammass was planning a breakout. Three weeks earlier, the Saudis warned nettingyahoo.
There is theory around that the twin towers was a false flag ....
Nitpicker here - please learn the correct way to say Pahlavi 🙏
Very few people mention the fatwah in Iran which prevents them from developing or using nuclear b0mbs. The state of Iran is moral and ethical and as a theocracy it lives by the word of Allah swt.
Brilliant Jonathan. On the one hand I have my doubts about the ability of the US to impose it's will on the rest of the world, on the other I look at the state of the UK and clearly see the effects of 50 years of not standing up to neocons, full spectrum dominance. But even here there are the seeds of resistance. It has taken me years to derive a model with sufficient explanatory power to describe MOST of what we see. You write it down, clearly and concisely. Great work. Thanks.
The "Post fact truth." CO Western MSM.
I agree with everything you say Jonathan. Just one thing. I believe the wars in Ukraine & Israel are to stop BRICS from growing any stronger. At the moment these are economical wars, China, Russia, Iran. India is a bit of an oddball as its Islamophobic thanks to Pakistani terrorists (possibly MOSSAD led). But are still friendly with Russia (for helping India gain Independence and kicking out the Brits!)
July 6-7 in Brazil is the BRICS 2025 Summit. Lets see if the "West's" MSM starts frothing at the mouth demonising the countries that do not obey!
BRICS is unstoppable unless USA uses the Bomb!
Totally agree. It's about oil and the petro-dollar. If the US loses its stranglehold on the current financial system, its markets will crash. As BRICS gets stronger, the US gets more frightened and panicky, because they do not want a multipolar world, only hegemony.
Spot on
With a privilege-/entitlement-based mentality, Netanyahu's Israel bombs and destroys targets, including civilians, inside nations around it — not to mention assassinates foreign citizens who Israel deems a threat.
Not that long ago, Israel attacked the Iranian embassy in Damascus last April that killed, among others, senior Iranian generals; and then Israel brazenly warned Iran against retaliating, with U.S./Canadian/British news-media headlines referencing it as though Iran's retaliation would be the first, war-instigating strike. They behaved like, to use a Trumpian slander, “crooked media”.
This all reveals a great yet misplaced sense of entitlement by the Israeli state, not to mention that of the U.S. via its own corrupt foreign policy. It’s as though it feels it can claim it was being proactive in its militarily unprovoked killings in another country of Iranians [or other foreign nationals] it deems a threat, and its suspicions should suffice as justification. But they really don't.