BBC operates under 'royal charter' which means keep the status quo, medieval mafia monarchy, unelected second chamber, 'subjects' not citizens - British Brainwashing Corporation, keeping the British people in their place whilst appearing as 'the gold standard' of journalism. Britain is the most corrupt country in the universe pretending to be the one with the most checks and balances. Unfortunately many Brits still believe it, they are treated like children and act like children. Living in London today is like living in Disneyland, one big theme park with musical theatre about anything that moves and tourists being entertained on street corners by people dressed as dinosaurs. Gone are Londoners, gone is the once sophisticated city.
The clearly compromised, heavily corporatized, pro-IDF/-Netanyahu-Israel Western news-media unfortunately goes far beyond BBC.
Particularly with Israel’s systematic mass slaughter and starvation of Gazan non-combatants young and old, that news-media have been, to put it mildly, editorially emasculated. Though it may be due to orders from ownership headquarters and therefore beyond their control, our (Canada's) news-media are serious offenders.
The most notable example is The National Post. One would really have to read it to believe it, especially since the initial (10/7) Hamas attack against Israel. It epitomizes an extreme example of an echo chamber promoting unconditional 110% support for the Israeli state, including its very-long-practiced cruelty towards the Palestinian people.
For example, shortly after that Hamas attack, a single-column story about a five-year-old American-Palestinian boy who was stabbed to death by the landlord of the residence in which he and his mother lived simply for being Palestinian was placed on page 5, while placed up high on the front page was a large photo (which accompanied a much larger story) with three Israeli teenage girls crying after their friends or family were kidnapped by Hamas gunmen.
More progressive outlets like Canada's other national newspaper, The Globe and Mail — progressive in regard to basically following “woke” ideology: that of race, sexuality, gender, gender-bending, and unrestricted abortion access — may be considered more deceptive with its largely pro-Israel stance, especially since 10/7, as there seems to have been an attempt at appearing objective on this topic when it actually is not.
I believe it’s the ethical/moral duty of Western journalists and editors to publicly expose the compromised news-media product and therefor its facilitator(s). By doing so, such brave journalists can at least then also proclaim they will no longer participate in its creation and/or dissemination.
Over decades, I’ve heard of too many cases of employees not standing up and doing what is necessary for the public and/or human(e) good, instead excusing themselves with something like: ‘I need this job — I have a family to support’. I’m afraid that — unless, of course, they were actually forced into coupling, copulating and procreating however many years before — such familial obligation status does not actually ethically or morally justify their willing involvement.
Quite frankly, journalists/editors with genuine integrity should and would tender their resignations and even publicly proclaim they can no longer help propagate their employer’s media product, whether it involves self-censored/missing coverage of a brutally lopsided foreign war or that of domestic corporate corruption that will harm the populace.
My goodness Mr Jonathan. How glad i am that you are suppoting the Palestinian people. This morning over my coffee made by the wife
What do you think of today's effort. Not bad she says. Ticks all the boxes. The genocide word was used a lot. Mr Benjamin was introduced. But i think he was risky ground by talking about the people killed at the Nova music festival. How so i ask. Well he was saying that the people giving the stories of that massacre were not investigated ... i mean they could have been soldiers of the IDF. Whats that got to do with it i ask. Some if not all probably were. All people serve in the military. So what .well the little fellows dad was investigated and they said he was Hamas. Again i said so what. They are the resistance. Anyways they should have investigated the little fellow quite a few showing him with the Hamas dudes
Ah probably created by AI. yes probably she agreed. Anyways whose side do you think mr Jonathan will promote in this Druze incident. Depends on who gets genocided. Thats not nice she says.
Great insight, thank you. By paying a licence fee, it makes ordinary people feel they are complicit in Genocide. It is important to castrate such deceitful media outlets controlled by the establishment and billionaire class.
Ya that's true that's why I've stopped paying tv license
Refuse to contribute to paying for lies and misinformation
BBC operates under 'royal charter' which means keep the status quo, medieval mafia monarchy, unelected second chamber, 'subjects' not citizens - British Brainwashing Corporation, keeping the British people in their place whilst appearing as 'the gold standard' of journalism. Britain is the most corrupt country in the universe pretending to be the one with the most checks and balances. Unfortunately many Brits still believe it, they are treated like children and act like children. Living in London today is like living in Disneyland, one big theme park with musical theatre about anything that moves and tourists being entertained on street corners by people dressed as dinosaurs. Gone are Londoners, gone is the once sophisticated city.
Corporatized news media? Same in Australia. The Murdochracy reigns untouched.
The clearly compromised, heavily corporatized, pro-IDF/-Netanyahu-Israel Western news-media unfortunately goes far beyond BBC.
Particularly with Israel’s systematic mass slaughter and starvation of Gazan non-combatants young and old, that news-media have been, to put it mildly, editorially emasculated. Though it may be due to orders from ownership headquarters and therefore beyond their control, our (Canada's) news-media are serious offenders.
The most notable example is The National Post. One would really have to read it to believe it, especially since the initial (10/7) Hamas attack against Israel. It epitomizes an extreme example of an echo chamber promoting unconditional 110% support for the Israeli state, including its very-long-practiced cruelty towards the Palestinian people.
For example, shortly after that Hamas attack, a single-column story about a five-year-old American-Palestinian boy who was stabbed to death by the landlord of the residence in which he and his mother lived simply for being Palestinian was placed on page 5, while placed up high on the front page was a large photo (which accompanied a much larger story) with three Israeli teenage girls crying after their friends or family were kidnapped by Hamas gunmen.
More progressive outlets like Canada's other national newspaper, The Globe and Mail — progressive in regard to basically following “woke” ideology: that of race, sexuality, gender, gender-bending, and unrestricted abortion access — may be considered more deceptive with its largely pro-Israel stance, especially since 10/7, as there seems to have been an attempt at appearing objective on this topic when it actually is not.
I believe it’s the ethical/moral duty of Western journalists and editors to publicly expose the compromised news-media product and therefor its facilitator(s). By doing so, such brave journalists can at least then also proclaim they will no longer participate in its creation and/or dissemination.
Over decades, I’ve heard of too many cases of employees not standing up and doing what is necessary for the public and/or human(e) good, instead excusing themselves with something like: ‘I need this job — I have a family to support’. I’m afraid that — unless, of course, they were actually forced into coupling, copulating and procreating however many years before — such familial obligation status does not actually ethically or morally justify their willing involvement.
Quite frankly, journalists/editors with genuine integrity should and would tender their resignations and even publicly proclaim they can no longer help propagate their employer’s media product, whether it involves self-censored/missing coverage of a brutally lopsided foreign war or that of domestic corporate corruption that will harm the populace.
My goodness Mr Jonathan. How glad i am that you are suppoting the Palestinian people. This morning over my coffee made by the wife
What do you think of today's effort. Not bad she says. Ticks all the boxes. The genocide word was used a lot. Mr Benjamin was introduced. But i think he was risky ground by talking about the people killed at the Nova music festival. How so i ask. Well he was saying that the people giving the stories of that massacre were not investigated ... i mean they could have been soldiers of the IDF. Whats that got to do with it i ask. Some if not all probably were. All people serve in the military. So what .well the little fellows dad was investigated and they said he was Hamas. Again i said so what. They are the resistance. Anyways they should have investigated the little fellow quite a few showing him with the Hamas dudes
Ah probably created by AI. yes probably she agreed. Anyways whose side do you think mr Jonathan will promote in this Druze incident. Depends on who gets genocided. Thats not nice she says.
Great insight, thank you. By paying a licence fee, it makes ordinary people feel they are complicit in Genocide. It is important to castrate such deceitful media outlets controlled by the establishment and billionaire class.