[First published by Middle East Eye]
Benjamin Netanyahu’s whirlwind visit to the United States last week to address the United Nations General Assembly was further evidence that the Israeli prime minister is now a universal pariah.
He is being abandoned even by his closest allies.
It was perhaps not surprising that 77 nations, including a handful of European states, walked out of the chamber in protest that a wanted war crimes suspect – a fugitive from the International Criminal Court (ICC) – was being given a platform to speak on the world’s largest stage.
Far more notable was what happened – or rather, didn’t – away from the podium. Netanyahu spent just eight hours in the US before heading back to Israel. It is hard to believe that that was his choice.
He was denied his usual moment in the sun with Donald Trump at the White House, and could not even secure a meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
There was no invitation to address the US Congress, and with it familiar scenes of legislators rapturously celebrating his anti-Palestinian incitement.
Israel’s former ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren, told Reuters: “I don’t recall a time when the prime minister came to the United States and didn’t meet with the president.”
The shunning of Netanyahu stood in stark contrast to the reception of Xi Jinping. The Chinese leader was personally greeted at the airport by Trump with a red carpet and military flyover.
Warnings ignored
Netanyahu’s UN visit was exploited by both sides – by Israeli officials and western leaders – to advance their separate, and conflicting, agendas.
Netanyahu is a month away from a hotly contested general election in which, for the first time, his failures to prevent Hamas’s attack on 7 October 2023 are under intense scrutiny.
According to a growing number of recent reports, he was warned by Egyptian and Gulf leaders of a major event – an “earthquake” – coming from Gaza in the days and weeks preceding Hamas’ breakout, but failed to act.
Netanyahu had scheduled his UN speech for Israeli prime time, to attract the largest domestic audience possible. He took the opportunity to call out other world leaders as “moral cowards” and “hypocrites”.
As Israeli analyst Jonathan Ofir notes, Netanyahu also used the UN platform to smuggle in a biblical phrase in Hebrew that was designed, for listeners back home, to serve as a dog-whistle: a call for Israel to carry out genocide to the bitter end.
Netanyahu’s goal was to demonstrate to voters that he is still a force to be reckoned with on the international stage, and that he alone can make Israel safe from a world supposedly mired in “antisemitic”, anti-Israel sentiment.
Western leaders, by contrast, wish to demonstrate the precise opposite, hoping to nudge Netanyahu out of office by suggesting to Israelis that their leader is a spent force, that he has gone too far.
Time to be rid of him.
This may prove no simple matter. Netanyahu is the great political survivor, serving a record near-two decades as his country’s prime minister – longer even than Israel’s founding father, David Ben Gurion. He has used that time to whip up much of Israeli society into an ever greater, ultra-nationalist, genocidal fervour.
Political liability
The current antipathy in western capitals to Netanyahu is most certainly not based on any kind of ethical assessment of Israel’s recent actions: a three-year genocidal rampage through Gaza; the violent expansion of Jewish settlements and ethnic cleansing in the Occupied West Bank; the bombing and ethnic cleansing of south Lebanon; and the Israeli leader’s starring role alongside the US in launching a catastrophic war on Iran whose fallout has destabilised the global economy.
Washington – backed by its European client states – has been an ardent partner to these crimes, supplying the munitions, intelligence and diplomatic leverage to help Israel carry them out.
But Netanyahu now looks to be a political liability, even for Trump.
The US president, nosediving in the polls, needs a scapegoat – and the Israeli prime minister appears the only one suited for the role.
The antagonism is, in part, personal.
A number of recent reports indicate that Netanyahu pulled out all the stops to seduce Trump, against the advice of his generals, into launching an unprovoked and illegal war on Iran.
The promise of a decisive victory persuaded Trump he could secure his place in the history books as the president who “remade the Middle East”. Once Iran was out of the picture, the US would enjoy unchallenged control over the region’s oil.
And all of this would supposedly take place weeks after Trump had cemented his command over Venezuela’s oil, following an illegal operation at the start of the year to kidnap President Nicholas Maduro.
With Iran’s defeat, and Venezuela subjugated, economic rival China would find itself utterly dependent on the US for access to the main lubricant of the global economy. Trump could avoid a direct military confrontation with Beijing, bringing it to heel simply by threatening to turn off the oil spigot.
But, of course none of this came to pass.
Washington is now in an unwinnable war with Iran that has clarified to Tehran the extent of its power over the Strait of Hormuz - and of the parallel power of Ansar Allah, its allies in Yemen, over the Bab al-Mandab Strait. Together, they can inflict unmitigated damage to the world economy.
Soaring petrol prices on US forecourts are likely to be a critical factor in the collapse of the Republican vote in November’s mid-term elections and the likely loss of both Houses to the Democrats, turning Trump into a lame-duck president.
Meanwhile, the war has educated Washington’s client states in the Gulf that they are supremely vulnerable to any retaliation from Tehran and from Yemen – a fact they are reminded of every time Trump orders another reckless round of strikes on Iran.
For all its military might, Washington has shown it is unable to defend its Gulf allies.
Facing a reckoning
But Netanyahu is not facing a reckoning just because of his role in engineering a disastrous war on Iran.
Despite the best efforts of western political and media classes over the past three years, the reality of Israel’s destruction of Gaza – and the murder and maiming of many tens of thousands of Palestinian children – has become ever harder to hide or rationalise.
Even among those parts of the public little interested in world affairs, the truth is gradually sinking in, aided by battles in mainstream cultural spaces that have swung conclusively against Israel.
NAZA, a new documentary on Gaza made by Israeli film-makers, won a record, 25-minute standing ovation at last month’s Venice Film Festival. In it, anonymised Israeli soldiers and intelligence officers document in detail how they engineered genocide in the tiny enclave. It is scheduled to be available to stream for free in November.
Ireland’s team, forced to play Israel in the Uefa Nations League at the weekend, did not hide their feelings. They wore black armbands in a show of solidarity with Israel’s victims in Gaza and refused to shake hands with their opponents. Irish captain Dara O’Shea pledged to donate his match earnings to humanitarian causes in Gaza.
Superstar musician Ed Sheeran has found himself unexpectedly painted as the bad guy for failing to stand by his support act, the rapper Macklemore, over the latter’s comments opposing genocide in Gaza.
Predictably, when faced with pro-Israel stadium owners threatening to pull the plug on the tour, Sheeran caved and dropped Macklemore. But Sheeran is reeling from a widespread backlash that clearly took him by surprise.
And leading British politicians, such as former prime minister Keir Starmer and foreign secretaries David Cameron and David Lammy, are for the first time facing serious critical scrutiny in the mainstream over their conduct towards Gaza.
Last week, a Channel 4 documentary, Britain’s Gaza Secrets Exposed, revealed that British officials had imposed a deeply flawed methodology, apparently so they could ignore mounting evidence of systematic Israeli war crimes in Gaza.
As a result, they were able to duck out of their legal obligations to take action against Israel, including by ending arms sales.
Tide of revulsion
Western capitals are finally realising this rising tide of revulsion at the Gaza genocide cannot be staunched.
In the US, where bonds to Israel are invariably described by politicians as “unbreakable”, 62 per cent of respondents told Pew in July they had a negative opinion of Netanyahu’s government.
Meanwhile, a poll last month found 60 per cent of American Jews want the Israeli prime minister voted out at the forthcoming election.
As Israel’s Haaretz newspaper observed: “Trump is well aware of the consistent, dizzying decline in support for Israel among Americans.”
Which is why he and other western politicians are desperate to reframe the conversation. Singling out Netanyahu over Israeli atrocities in Gaza does not get them off the hook because they so obviously partnered with him every step of the way.
Instead western leaders want to switch focus to the West Bank, where their role is more easily obscured and Netahyahu’s law-breaking is unmistakable.
Since October 2023, he, along with his self-confessed fascist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, have given both violent Jewish settler militias and the Israeli military greater freedom to terrorise Palestinian families off their land in preparation for the West Bank’s annexation.
In the West’s new, self-serving narrative, Netanyahu isn’t a pariah because he is sought by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity in starving the people of Gaza.
Nor because the International Court of Justice is currently investigating his government over “plausible” allegations that it is committing a genocide in the enclave.
Nor because his government has overseen the killing of at least 21,000 children there – and most likely, far more.
Nor because he continues to violate a sham “ceasefire”, one in which Israel has killed more than 1,400 Palestinians penned up in the ruins of their enclave since the fighting supposedly ended. A further 4,900 of Gaza’s residents have been maimed over the same period.
No, Netanyahu is not a pariah in the eyes of western leaders because of any of these savage crimes – crimes they have been fully complicit in.
His offence – the one they are now determined to focus attention on – is Netanyahu’s role since October 2023 in intensifying the building and expansion of illegal settlements in the West Bank to expel Palestinians from their lands.
But this narrative works only if western politicians and media studiously ignore the context: that for more than half a century, all Israeli governments sponsored settlement expansion, with the aim of ethnically cleansing the Palestinian population.
Netanyahu is not an outlier in doing this. He simply exploited the opportunity to accelerate West Bank expulsions on the back of world sympathy after Hamas’s single-day attack in October 2023.
‘Ethnic cleansing’
The most likely explanation for why Britain and 11 other western states, including France and Canada, declared their intention last month to impose sanctions on West Bank settlements is that they had received signs from the Trump administration for the first time that there would be no serious repercussions for doing so.
Britain’s new government under Andy Burnham also dared to describe what Israel has done to West Bank Palestinians as “ethnic cleansing”. Notably, and paradoxically, the UK has avoided using the term to describe Israel’s even more brazen ethnic cleansing in Gaza – a campaign of expulsions that have all too clearly been aided by western bombs and logistics.
Officials under Mike Huckabee, the fervently partisan US ambassador to Israel, reportedly drafted a stinging rebuke in preparation for the British announcement of sanctions. It accused London of replicating the “playbook of the antisemitic boycott, divestment and sanctions [BDS] movement”.
That expected line of attack, favoured by Israel lobby groups, was presumably the reason why Ed Miliband, the UK’s foreign secretary, went to such exaggerated lengths to publicly distance his new policy from BDS.
But in fact, no attack materialised from the Trump administration. Instead, Marco Rubio, Miliband’s US counterpart, stated innocuously: “I don’t have any comment on it [the sanctions policy] right now.”
The next day Trump appeared to buy time with a uncharacteristically non-committal response: “I want to find out why all of a sudden has that [the announcement of UK sanctions] happened.”
Trump and Rubio have said nothing more of substance on the matter.
Then there is the recent flood of media reports suggesting that Netanyahu personally failed to listen to multiple warnings from Egypt and the United Arab Emirates that an unprecedented attack was coming from Gaza in the days before Hamas’ break-out on 7 October 2023.
Netanyahu has called on Abu Dhabi to deny the leaks. But it has so far failed to help out by doing so.
The two countries, among Washington’s closest client states in the region, have always appeared anxious to avoid openly defying a notoriously vengeful Trump.
Theatre of distraction
In his address to the UN, Burnham noted the dilemma facing western governments: “We live in an age of low trust in politics. If we were to continue to talk about the two-state solution, but fail to back those words with deeds, that trust will fall even lower – and our enemies will seek to exploit the alienation that follows from that.”
Burnham seems oblivious to the reality: that part of the reason trust is so low is because a succession of British governments have not only colluded in the genocide in Gaza but arrested critics of the genocide as supporters of terrorism.
Miliband demonstrated precisely the kind of hypocrisy Burnham had warned is alienating the public when he told the Labour Party conference this week – to great applause – that “millions of people in this country”, opponents of the genocide, “were right”.
The previous day dozens of protesters had been arrested outside the conference venue for silently holding signs stating: “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.”
Burnham and Miliband wish to have their cake and eat it. Neither has indicated that there is any intention to scrap the previous government’s decision to use terrorism laws against anyone who holds such a sign – or is “right”, as Miliband now admits.
What western leaders are engaged in here is the cynical theatre of distraction.
The declarations of “You were right” and “We feel your pain”, the promises of sanctions and urgent calls for two states, amount to nothing more than virtue-signalling. They are designed to divert public indignation over Israel’s atrocities away from the complicity of western capitals and direct it exclusively at Netanyahu.
The new spin suggests the gun-wielding, religious zealots in the West Bank settlements who have been growing ever more violent and politically powerful for over half a century – under successive Israeli governments – are solely Netanyahu’s creation.
The new spin argues that the growing confidence of these pogromists, who have long worked hand in glove with the Israeli military, is entirely unrelated to the West’s unconditional support for Israel over many decades.
Business as usual
In absolving themselves, however, western leaders are necessarily crafting a new lie to deceive their publics: one that suggests the “settler terrorists” are some kind of personal Netanyahu militia that stands or falls with his premiership.
The implication of this new narrative is that, were Netanyahu to be prised from power, a more empathetic leadership would emerge, one that could be cultivated by western powers to make peace with the Palestinians.
This is all patent nonsense.
Like the Israeli public, leaders from across Israel’s narrow Zionist, ethnic supremacist political spectrum shared the genocidal logic that propelled forward the past three-year erasure of Gaza.
None dissented. All engaged in genocidal incitement.
There is no hope of their making peace with the Palestinians under illegal occupation when Israeli leaders cannot even allow their own Palestinian “citizens” – a much-oppressed minority comprising a fifth of Israel’s population – a meaningful voice in next month’s general election.
The central elections committee, a political body whose members are drawn from Israel’s main parties, voted to ban from standing all four factions representing the Palestinian minority.
Whoever wins next month’s election, whether Netanyahu again or one of his rivals, will keep the country heading on the same ethnic supremacist track Israel has been on for decades. Trump, Burnham, Macron and other western leaders understand this.
They want Netanyahu out of the way not so there is real change but simply so they can revert to what constituted business as usual before the Gaza genocide: a slower, more incremental pace to the eradication of the Palestinian people.
They want to be able to rebrand the Gaza genocide as one man’s historic folly, a tragic catastrophe that cannot be reversed but can be mitigated if he is gone.
They want us looking resolutely forwards, to real-estate deals and a distant two-state solution, not backwards: to their active role in levelling the homes of more than two million people – with mostly US munitions that unleashed eight times the explosive force of the atom bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The Trump administration has already okayed the shipment of vast numbers of these mega bombs to replenish Israeli stocks, even before the result of the Israeli election is known.
Notably, the same Trump administration that allowed Netanyahu, a war crimes suspect, to travel to the UN in New York blocked the putative leader of the Palestinians, Mahmoud Abbas, from doing so.
In announcing his new sanctions policy targeting Israel’s illegal settlements, Miliband was keen to stress that it would in no way affect intelligence sharing with Israel – the kind of intelligence coordination that saw British planes carrying out surveillance operations over Gaza throughout the genocide.
And while Miliband promised a “double lock against arms exports” to Israel as part of the UK’s sanctions package, in practice not a single existing arms export licence has been revoked or suspended since.
Sinking credibility
The current fight is not against a genocidal Israeli state or for some illusionary Palestinian state – let alone for justice for the endlessly abused Palestinian people.
It is about engineering a reset in which the West gets Israel’s old guard back in charge.
Western leaders have been embarrassed by the froth-mouthed rantings of Netanyahu’s government. This week Smotrich called for Israel to unleash its genocidal Gaza policies on the West Bank – presumably using the very bombs Trump is about to ship them.
He told the Israeli media: “We should do there what we did in Gaza.”
Western leaders fear what that would do to their sinking credibility. And they have allies in Israel, among its opposition, whose vision – at least for the moment – is not Smotrich’s of a Gaza-style eradication of the West Bank.
Rather they envision continuing the current trajectory of gradually turning the West Bank’s small, surviving Palestinian ghettos, trapped in a sea of illegal Jewish settlements, into mini-concentration camps – replicas of Gaza before it was destroyed.
Those are the competing visions among Israelis for the West Bank: the absolute confinement of Palestinians in a series of cages versus their extermination.
That is what is really at stake – nothing more – in the West’s struggle to unseat Netanyahu and uphold its fabled two-state solution.
[Many thanks to Matthew Alford for the audio reading of this article.]
Although my posts are freely accessible, they are reader-supported. If you liked this one or any of the others, please consider sharing it with friends and making a donation to support my work. You can do so by becoming a paid Substack subscriber, via Paypal or my bank account, or alternatively by setting up a monthly direct debit mandate with GoCardless. A complete archive of my writings is available on my website. I’m on X, Facebook and Bluesky.
And it took ~3 years for American and European government to feel revulsion of Netanyahu and the Israeli genocide of Palestinians in Gaza...
Yet, the US and Europe keep sending weapons and ammunition to Israel.
Yet, the US keeps two aircraft carrier strike groups in the Arabian Sea.
Yet, UK and its Prime Minister Andy Burnham are spinning the Israeli narrative of Iran being behind the "incident" at RAF Fairford.
And let's not forget that, no matter who is the Prime Minister of Israel, this Zionist entity will remain a genocidal actor in the Middle East. Nothing will change with Eisenkot in power instead of Netanyahu.
It is just the umpteenth play of "good cop, bad cop" and distraction ploy.
Nothing is going to change in the Middle East (and anywhere else) until the Epstein class in the West is removed from power!
Like Lady Macbeth, the west can't get the blood off their hands no matter how they spin their past and current support of Israel.
Trust is earned, and the western elite who support Israel have lost the trust of people with a conscience.
"The declarations of “You were right” and “We feel your pain”, the promises of sanctions and urgent calls for two states, amount to nothing more than virtue-signalling. They are designed to divert public indignation over Israel’s atrocities away from the complicity of western capitals and direct it exclusively at Netanyahu."