Indeed, it is genocide apologism. +1 about Isaac Chotiner's interview with Jacobson in The New Yorker. Chotiner presses Jacobson on basic facts, as any responsible journalist should, and Jacobson crumbles into complete incoherence in response. It is incredible. It demonstrates the incoherence, even schizophrenia, of the so-called "libera…
Indeed, it is genocide apologism. +1 about Isaac Chotiner's interview with Jacobson in The New Yorker. Chotiner presses Jacobson on basic facts, as any responsible journalist should, and Jacobson crumbles into complete incoherence in response. It is incredible. It demonstrates the incoherence, even schizophrenia, of the so-called "liberal Zionist" position when faced with evidence of human rights atrocities, war crimes, other violations of international law, and genocide.
Indeed, it is genocide apologism. +1 about Isaac Chotiner's interview with Jacobson in The New Yorker. Chotiner presses Jacobson on basic facts, as any responsible journalist should, and Jacobson crumbles into complete incoherence in response. It is incredible. It demonstrates the incoherence, even schizophrenia, of the so-called "liberal Zionist" position when faced with evidence of human rights atrocities, war crimes, other violations of international law, and genocide.